The True Purpose Of A Book Review

Yesterday, I found something on Twitter that rubbed me the wrong way. I don’t know who originally wrote the Tweet, since the person’s handle has been cropped out (rightfully so to protect them, I assume), and it sparked something in me.

There are a few things to unpack here, so let’s go line by line.

“If you can’t be nice about it” — Who says that all book reviews and reviewers have to be nice? What if you dislike a book? Don’t you have the right to express your disappointment, your frustration, your anger? I understand that most of us had been brought up to believe that “if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all” but when your book review could help deter someone from reading a potentially harmful book, you can’t use a “rainbows and unicorns” ideology. That doesn’t mean you should use hurtful language in expressing your disappoint or use it as an opportunity to attack the author but you have every right to be negative about a book that you didn’t like.

“You believe the book warrants less than 3 or 4 stars” — I hate to break it to you, but not every single book in this world is a 5 star read. If you personally think a book deserves 2 stars, give it the 2 stars! Why are we so afraid of awarding a bad book less than 3 stars? Who are you trying to protect by not being honest?

“You should try to contact the author directly” — I shouldn’t have to say this, but for the love of god, please do not do this. Ever.

“They probably want to know, even if it hurts, but trashing them publicly doesn’t serve anyone” — And here’s the real kicker. The idea that a negative review (not a public trashing, mind you) doesn’t serve anyone is honestly the most ignorant thing I’ve ever heard. Of course authors want to read positive reviews about their work but if a reader reads nothing but positive reviews for a book they may or may not want to read, and end up disliking it, who do they blame? Others for hyping it up? The author for not delivering? Themselves for believing the positive reviews?

The truth about the purpose of book reviews is that we’re not writing them for the author; we’re writing them for other readers. We want to know what other readers think of a book before we go out and buy it so we can prepare ourselves for what we’re getting into. We want to know what friends and strangers alike think of a book so we can figure out if the book in question is the right fit for us. I can’t even begin to count how many books I’ve regretted reading because all I’d seen were positive reviews praising the work and author alike on the absolute surface level and I end up finding so many problems and issues with it. I get that people want to “protect” the author, but if all they read are 5 star positive reviews, they’re never going to learn what they’ve done wrong or improve in any way.

I absolutely agree that publicly bashing an author or what could potentially be their life’s work is wrong, but writing a negative review and bashing an author don’t go hand in hand. There’s always a right and wrong way of going about a negative review; it’s called constructive criticism for a reason. But you have to remember that other readers want to know what you honestly think about a book. I want to know that my 2 star review of a book I disliked is valid by looking at other likeminded reviews more than I want people on Goodreads to like my 4 star glowing review.

The book community, in some pockets, has locked itself in a bubble where they’re too afraid to give an honest opinion either because they don’t want to hurt someone’s feelings or they’re afraid of someone “coming for them,” which is so toxic I don’t even want to touch that with a 10 foot pole (I’m looking at you, book twitter). And I believe that we have the marketing and publicity teams of publishers to blame, in part. Not all readers/bloggers/book influencers think this way but within this pocket there are those who think they HAVE to say nice things about what they read so publishers will notice them and their marketing teams will RT them or use them in their next publicity strategies. It kind of goes hand in hand with why influencer culture is so toxic and it seems it has trickled its way into how people think they need to write reviews. But if you’re writing your reviews for publishers, or for authors, so they’ll like you and use you for good publicity then you’re not doing it for the right reason. Not only should you be writing your book review for your fellow readers but you should be writing it for yourself. If you can’t recognize your own voice in your review then something’s wrong.

While I always knew who and what I was writing book reviews for, I guess there are still people who haven’t quite figured that out yet. But I want people to know that they shouldn’t be afraid to write a 2 star review of something they didn’t like because that opinion should be just as valid as a 5 star review. Of course you don’t want to hurt an author’s feelings, but don’t let that stop you from thinking your negative reviews won’t serve anyone because I promise, they will.

4 Comments

  1. Fabulous post!!! I agree with everything you said, reviews are definitely for the readers and not for the authors. Same with Goodreads is a place for readers, not for authors. And a BIG NO to contacting authors. And I was cracking up when I saw the 3 or 4 star comment. The reviews I usually look at have three stars, those are often the most honest, or at least they feel the most honest to me.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I completely agree with all the points you made! First off, reviews are for readers, not authors. There are so many times that a negative review helps me realize that I wouldn’t like a book either, and keeps a book from getting ever more negative reviews. But positive reviews can also mention something that makes me not want to read a book. Reviews in general are important.

    But more importantly, the idea of telling an author directly what it is you disliked about a book is just terrible! Criticism hurts even when it’s well intentioned, and from people you know and respect. To have random strangers trash your book when really reading is subjective and a matter of preference is just awful! No author deserves to be tagged in a negative review, or to have a negative review explicitly sent to them. If they want criticism they have people they can ask, or can go on Goodreads and look it up themselves. It shouldn’t be forced on them!

    Anyways, great post! I really enjoyed your response to this absurd tweet!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much! And your point in regards to authors and negative reviews is so right; if they want to know they’ll look it up but no one should ever directly tag or inform them. It’s their choice to read any type of review and we shouldn’t take that away from them.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s